Restoring Damaged Ethics

The four young hunger strikers finished up their tenth day this Wednesday, just before a typhoon hit Tokyo in full force.

Do these these two look tired and hungry? It’s been nine days….

Miraculously, the first nine days had been mostly sunny, with only a few scattered showers. ” How will they fare in the pouring rain?” I fretted, opening up my laptop and clicking on the link to their live web camera…..and there they were!  Draped in head- to- toe raingear and grinning unconcernedly, they were engaged in spirited conversation with reporters as if this were a normal day.  I concentrated on Masaaki, the young man from Chiba with the stylish hair, who was speaking with a reporter about what had most impressed him during his ten day ordeal (though I tell you, it did not seem like an ordeal at all. Curiosity-seekers wondering what it’s actually like to deny oneself food for a ten day stretch would come away disappointed, as none of the four betrayed obvious signs of hardship.  They did occasionally stretch out and nap at times, but normal Japanese do that, too).  Anyway,  Masaaki’s response to the reporter both startled and touched me, so I will paraphrase it in English for you: ” We were all surprised,” he said, “by the older people who continued to stop by and apologize to us.  Some wept as they apologized for what their generation had done to our generation, and the four of us didn’t know what to say.  We don’t think of the situation that way at all, and felt there was no need for such humility…”

Haruki Murakami

Listening on the live camera, I thought about the depths of sadness and responsibility felt by those older people, and about the gentle spirits of the young people, who were not about shaming and blaming, but about constructive action in the spirit of peace and healing.  I then re-read the fine English translation of Murakami Haruki’s speech (given on June 10th in Barcelona, Spain, at his acceptance of a prestigious literary award), remembering that Haruki had said something that might be of relevance to the situation. Here’s a link to the speech itself,  found on the blog Senrinomichi...http://www.senrinomichi.com/?p=2728  And I’ll follow with a few tidbits from the speech that I want to share.

Speaking of the years following the second World War,  Murakami speaks of Japan’s choice to follow the path of efficiency and convenience, relying on nuclear power generation as a means to rebuild the country, eventually becoming so dependent on it that alternative power sources came to seem unrealistic and impossible. “Those who harbored doubts about nuclear power generation came to be labelled as ‘unrealistic dreamers’ “, says Murakami , reflecting that “We should have been working to develop alternative energy sources to replace nuclear power at a national level, by harvesting all existing technologies, wisdom and social capital. ”

I have written about some of the “unrealistic dreamers” in past blog entries, including a group of  renegade TEPCO stockholders who faithfully attend meetings each year in order to cause trouble for the nuclear power industry. For twenty years they have held onto their TEPCO stock for the sole purpose of submitting a yearly proposal to abolish nuclear power.  It took a crisis the size of Fukushima to get them news coverage, but this year we finally heard their story, and millions read in the daily papers how one emboldened renegade suggested that the President of TEPCO should  “Jump into the reactors and die!” Another suggested hara-kiri, or Japanese ritual disembowelment. Mind you, I am not suggesting that we express our sentiments in this extreme fashion (anyone who knows me well will vouch for this), but the man is an example of just the sort of person Murakami was speaking about. Those stockholders had probably endured decades of being labelled as crazy, embarrassing, or (at the least) unrealistic. Some of them, no doubt, had wives and family who were mortified by their behavior. After the Fukushima disaster, they were finally vindicated, but it was hardly a moment to rejoice.

 

Murakami also speaks of the crime committed against the environment, which has been poisoned beyond our ability to fully comprehend,  stating boldly that, “we are in fact both victims and perpetrators at the same time…Insofar as we are threatened by the force of nuclear power, we are all victims. Moreover, since we unleashed this power and were then unable to prevent ourselves from using it, we are also all perpetrators.”  And here’s the part that hurts: “….we must be critical of ourselves for having tolerated and allowed these corrupted systems to exist until now. This accident cannot be dissociated from our ethics and values.”  In short, people in Fukushima (and across the country as a whole) are angry for precisely this reason. In many ways, both government and TEPCO officials have refused to take any sort of moral responsibility for the disaster, and seem disassociated from the pain and suffering of the victims, and impervious to the plight of the damaged environment itself.

According to Murakami’s standard, these victims are also “perpetrators”, since many of them took a passive stance when nuclear power plants began to spring up in economically depressed coastal cities. They also enjoyed the benefits of wide-screen TVs (digital, of course), dishwashers, clothes dryers, and other luxuries they could not have dreamed of before , all powered by electricity that they gradually began to take for granted.  And now, many of the older generation that invited the nuclear power plants to their towns and

Plenty of older folk waving placards at Monday’s protest in Tokyo…

earned their livings working for the industry itself are sunk in a morass of deep regret. So….. are they wallowing there in the morass, unable to move beyond their own mortification?  Hardly!  Seniors who are physically able are taking themselves to Tokyo (those in nearby prefectures come by train, and those from Fukushima arrive in chartered busses) to protest.  Although Japanese have a paranoia about giving out any sort of personal information or signing petitions, they are signing

everything in sight. They are marching in the streets along with young mothers pushing strollers; they are carrying placards and cheering loudly at rallys.  I cannot say how unusual this all is, and how stunned I was to attend my first “Demo”in Tokyo this past Monday, to find the streets full of old people. They wanted to talk, they wanted to be interviewed.  They visited the hunger strikers in Kasumigaseki, tearful and apologetic for leaving the country in such a mess.

Spotlight on still more senior citizens: In another previous blog post, I had mentioned Yasutera Yamada, the 72 year old leader of a

Yamada-san and his squad are ready and waiting!

squad of hundreds of older men and women who are ready and waiting to be called in to clean up the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. Having lived full lives already, they are willing to risk potential exposure to radiation and propose working longer shifts to increase efficiency and spare younger workers. According to recent news reports, Yamada and his team are fully organized and prepared to go in to work at a moment’s notice.

I have nothing by respect for the great majority of older people in this country, my own parents-in-law included.  Many feel duly ashamed, are doing their penance by radically cutting their electricity usage, and are willing–even in their seventies and eighties–to literally stand up for change by marching through the streets of Tokyo. Murakami says, “It is the job of experts to rebuild broken roads and buildings, but it is the duty of each of us to restore our damaged ethics and values.”  These old folks might know little of Murakami besides the name, and most are probably not aware that he made the Barcelona speech. Yet they’re on the right track with his value system, are they not?

Okay, skip back to the central government and the TEPCO officials. During Monday’s demonstration in Tokyo, I was asked by an Italian man toting a heavy video camera if I “trusted the Japanese government”?  I thought back to the first days of the nuclear crisis , when the hydrogen explosions were described on television as “a big booming noise” (What? Are we in Nursery School here?).  I remembered assuring friends in America that we hadn’t experienced a meltdown (because that’s what we were told), only to cringe in embarrassment weeks later when it was revealed that my friends were right.  I recalled watching the video of Shunichi Yamashita, the advisor to Fukushima Prefecture on health risk management during the nuclear crisis…..and maybe I’ll share that particular video with you, since this is what really influenced my ultimate mistrust and sense of outrage. The video was taken at a meeting held this Spring, when residents of Fukushima Prefecture were confused and anxious:  should they still be wearing masks?  Should they be hanging their laundry outside?  The current safe standard of radiation dosage per year had recently been “raised”, and what did that mean? And most pressing of all, were their children really safe?

Well, take a look at the “answer” they got. Yamashita-san, a graduate school professor from Nagasaki University,  began the session with what is known as “Ojisan-Gag” here in Japan. In other words, a very bad joke told by an old guy who thinks he’s funny. “Hey, Fukushima is famous, you guys! ” he chortles. “Even more famous than Chernobyl!” (He gets a bit of nervous laughter) Then comes the gag that fell flat as a pancake. “If you’re laughing right now, you won’t experience any effects from radiation. That’s scientifically proven!” he says with a smarmy smile…..followed by dead silence.  The video’s English subtitles are (again) not the best, but please be understanding.  You’ll definitely get the gist.

The meeting that was made famous in Japan by  Yamashita Senseii’s patronizing and unscientific speech took place in the Spring. There are more and longer videos of his advice to Fukushima residents,  always given with a smile (to ensure he won’t have any effects from the radiation?). When residents voiced their concern over government standards for a “safe” level of radiation (the standards had just been raised),  Yamashita-san deferred, “I don’t set the radiation standard. The government sets the standard. I have to follow the government as a Japanese citizen……Our country decided this, and we are its citizens. I think it’s better to think it’s safe and live a normal life than to worry too much about the future.”

Before the nuclear disaster, that kind of pat answer might have worked for some people.

Cesium-tainted topsoil being scraped from the grounds of an elementary school in Fukushima Prefecture.

For many people, even. But the stakes were too high, and parents were not satisfied with Yamashita-san’s answer. When schoolyards, tap water, milk, vegetables, and even sewage were regularly tested and found to contain high levels of cesium, parents became furious. Some had believed the advisor’s words, trusted that they would be safe, and chosen not to evacuate the prefecture.  And most incredibly, although other government officials have been fired because of callous remarks regarding Fukushima, Yamashita-san is still on the job. Mothers in Fukushima want him OUT, and there is currently a petition circulating with his dismissal listed as one of the conditions.

Lastly, let me mention a page I follow on facebook called “Embrace Transition”, dedicated to publishing articles and essays about post-3/11 Japan and the changes and choices that will shape its future.  This week’s offerings featured a moving- and yet ominous- essay by Angela Jeffs, a former London editor who has worked as a journalist and writer in Japan since 1986.  In her essay “Treasure”, Jeffs asks why, in the age of internet and cell phones, Japan’s central government did not move swiftly to evacuate the children of Fukushima, contrasting today’s situation with that of another era, when  230,000 children (including my father-in-law) were evacuted from Tokyo during the US bombings of 1944, with “Only the radio and community spirit and will” to facilitate the process. She makes the point that if such an evacuation had been instigated six months ago, Japan as a country would have rallied to the cause and welcomed the refugees.  Now, she fears, it may be more difficult for those wishing to leave, as discrimination and fears of ‘catching’ radiation sickness could prevent Fukushima evacuees from finding a warm and welcoming community. Although children are constantly referred to as “takara-mono”, or “treasure” in Japan,

Japan’s children: are they really treasures? (photo from Asahi Shinbun)

Jeffs believes the government has not treated them accordingly; in fact, she says, it has betrayed them. Here is her powerful closing: “It is my belief that the Japanese government, hand in hand with the nuclear industry, has committed a crime against humanity. And not only against the children of Fukushima and the north east but-in an ever-widening zone of suspicion and alarm-the children of Japan and the world at large.” Here’s the link to the “Embrace Transition” page on facebook, where you can find more of Angela’s writing and other thought-provoking pieces of writing: http://www.facebook.com/eTransition?sk=app_11007063052

Many people are angry these days.  Many people are worried, anxious, even paranoid about their own health.  Just yesterday, a blogger living in the relative safety of Yokohama posted about his planned “escape”/evacuation to France.  Mothers in Fukushima are moving to Tokyo.  Mothers in Tokyo are moving farther south, west, or even abroad. The population in the big city has already shown a slight decrease.  The anger and anxiety are justifiable, and we all feel a bit of both, to some degree. Yet we must not be overcome by either.  As Murakami said in his speech, we must begin the process of restoring our damaged ethics.

Although the hunger strikers in front of the Economics, Trade and Industy building did not make headlines, they affected individuals, gave people pause to think, and undoubtably made the government officials working inside extremely uncomfortable. Would you want to be feeding your face at noontime when the view from your window is rail-thin students (nice students! not the dirty, foul-mouthed, rough-looking kind), protesting the policies you represent?  Not me, thanks. The hunger strikers had an agenda (bringing an end to reliance on nuclear energy), a well-written and specific petition (asking for, among other things, the immediate halt to the construction of a new nuclear plant in Yamaguchi Prefecture), and infinite reserves of stamina, patience, and goodwill.

 They were pros, who did not slip up once, and saw their project through till the final press conference on the tenth day. They’ve already done their part in repairing damaged ethics as far as I’m concerned, and their generation had nothing to do with the building of nuclear reactors. For them, it’s not about repentance, but about preserving the future for their own children. The path of efficiency and easy living?  They’ve already proved they’re not interested. Flee the country out of fear for their own health?  No, they’re not that type either; there’s work to be done, and my guess is that they’re staying put. Friends of mine have mixed reactions to the hunger strikers, especially since they have already rejected the traditional Japanese path to adulthood. But Murakami would certainly salute them as just the kind of dreamers the country needs. I’ll end with his closing words, since I couldn’t hope to be more eloquent myself.

“We must not be afraid to dream. We should never allow the crazed dogs named ‘efficiency’ and ‘convenience’ to catch up with us. We must be ‘unrealistic dreamers’, who stride forward vigorously. Human beings will die and disappear, but humanity will prevail and will be constantly regenerated.  Above all, we must believe in this force.”

Good night; the air is cool and clear since the last typhoon, and the cicadas have finally ceased their shrilling. I will miss them, till the next summer. Thank you once again for reading.

All Hail the Brave and Restrained !

The four anti-nuclear hunger strikers sitting outside the office of Ministry of Economy,

Left to Right: Kin-chan, Masaaki, Kanta, and Shiori .

Trade and Industry (METI) don’t look even a bit extreme. Although she probably would give them a wide berth and avert her eyes, my mother-in-law would probably not be afraid of them. Take a look at the sweet smiles pictured here and tell me, would you? The leader, Naoya Okamoto (known as Kin-chan) is from the southern prefecture of Yamaguchi, where he’s already had experience as a protester and hunger striker (more about that later). He has a thin frame, an easy and unaffected smile, and a sparkle in his eye. Masaaki, a university student in Tokyo, is the oldest at 22. He has what Japanese girls would consider a cute hairstyle, and often smooths unruly strands into place on camera. Kanta Yonehara, 21, describes himself as a “Tabi-bito”, or traveller, and he looks the part, with his broad-brimmed straw hat and deep tan. Shiori Sekiguchi, the only girl, is a nineteen-year old college freshman from Tokyo. She’s never separated from her hot pink towel-blanket and white bill cap, and speaks slow but reliable unaccented English.

So how do I know these details? Well, it’s the age of the live webcam, and I’ve been checking in on them daily to make sure they’re taking care of themselves properly and holding up under the strain. After all, I’m a mother, and I can’t help imagining what on earth I would do or say if either of my own kids ( eighteen and twenty) announced their intention to sit outside and starve themselves voluntarily during a week of predicted record-breaking heat. Well, the four strikers have finished day seven, and after following them off and on all week, I believe I’d be okay with my kids doing exactly the same thing. Mind you, I will not encourage it, but if the situation should one day arise, they’d have my blessing.

First, let me qualify the hows and whys of this particular strike. Kin-chan and his friends have pre-determined the length of their strike (ten days), and are taking water and salt throughout the day to keep up their strength. They are hunger-striking as a form of non-violent protest against the use of nuclear power. Their official statement reads, “We are launching a 10 day-hunger strike in order to petition the Japanese government to reflect [on] the importance of lives and nature–which is the bread of life–within their policies. These are our prayers as the young generation, residents on the earth who will be forced to inherit the legacy of such responsibilities from you.” As Kin-san says, “It’s a poor legacy to be left with. We don’t want to live with these plants, we don’t want to live with the

Shiori Sekiguchi wants to respect her own life as well.

contamination they leave behind, and we don’t want to live with risks.” Shiori adds, “I want to respect everyone’s life and graduate from nuclear power, so I’ll also respect my life. I will take care of myself so not to be sent in the hospital.” They are practical, they are calm, they are determined. None of the four speak angrily, and I have never heard even a hint of foul language while watching on the 24 hour camera. Here is Kin-chan’s kick-off speech, recorded in a park in Tokyo, explaining their intentions and stating their convictions. Although (I repeat) his speech would not be branded as “extreme” in Japan, he’s devoted to his cause and he knows what he’s talking about. I like the fact that I don’t catch even a whiff of cynicism in his words, his voice, or his manner. While watching, please be understanding about the English translation. I consider it nothing short of miraculous to have found any translated version at all. It’s not perfect, but try to focus on the young man , rather than any strange spellings or grammatical errors.

…….and now that you’ve had an introduction to the four strikers, here’s a bit more about the history of their particular protest. It’s a continuation of an on-going protest taking place in a tiny island in Japan’s southern prefecture of Yamaguchi, called Iwaishima. An article about this very island and its troubled history was featured in the NY Times this August, thanks to the excellent reporting work of Hiroko Tabuchi, a Kobe native now based in Tokyo (you can follow her on Twitter…she’s always got something interesting and juicy to tweet about). Tabuchi recounted how residents had been fighting a proposed nuclear power plant on their island for three decades, getting older and creakier but not losing

Protestors in Iwaishima…still going strong after thirty years.

their sense of purpose. “It’s getting hard to keep fighting when everyone’s got a cane,” admitted one 70 year old grandmother, but that wasn’t stopping her. Another 68 year old grandmother became famous for tying herself to the dock on the day that ships sailed in to start the construction work. Since March 11th, the Iwaishima residents have finally begun to make progress, as the nation’s mindset has undergone a radical change and prefectoral officials have come down on the side of the island folks. Still, Chugoku Electric is determined to begin construction (despite the prefectoral government’s refusal to renew their license), and the issue is not yet resolved. And that’s where Kin-chan has been: in Yamaguchi Prefecture, lending his support to the old folks of Iwaishima. It was there that he endured his first ten-day hunger strike, eventually deciding to take his protest to Tokyo to seek a wider audience and extend his protest from one specific place to the broader spectrum of nuclear power plants throughout the country.

Now let’s talk about the strategy of the four young people. How successful have they been after a week of fasting in the public eye? Well, that depends entirely on how you judge success. I was terribly disappointed in the Tokyo Time Out review of the event. Time Out is a well-written magazine for hip young English-speakers living in Japan (borderline-geezers like myself love it, too) featuring current trends, popular products, concert and restaurant reviews, and human interest articles about life in the big city. I had hoped they might give

Our hunger strikers do not fit this stereotype. Disappointing? Or refreshing?

the protesters some positive publicity that would boost their cause; instead, I found a lukewarm description of a “small sit-in” led by a man who was younger, nicer, and less impressive than the Time Out reporter had expected. Describing the meeting with Kin-san as “anti-climactic”, the reporter admitted that perhaps Okamoto-san would perhaps be someone “to watch in years to come” [but nothing special now, was the implication]. “These are not men chained to trees or holding out in foxholes beneath partially built runways” was the consensus. Well, no, they’re not! And this is not a forest in the Amazon or a war zone in a third world country, either–it’s a main street in Tokyo, and they were behaving appropriately.

According to the hip Tokyo magazine, then, the hunger strike has had little to no effect. The final paragraph of the article reads, “….by pre-scheduling the end of the hunger strike, he [Okamoto] has removed the necessary do-or-die drama that would catch the headlines he hopes for……what is taking place outside Kasumigaseki Station feels brave but restrained. Maybe that’s why the last six months of anti-nuclear protests have, at times, felt like little more than a sideshow.” …..Ouch! Sorry, but that hurt. After reading the review, I decided to see what Wikipedia had to say about hunger strikes, and what constituted a “successful” protest. Here’s what I came up with: “A hunger strike cannot be effective if the fact that it is being undertaken is not publicized so as to be known by the people who are to be impressed, concerned or embarrassed by it.” Hmmm…..that didn’t make me feel much better. Though the group’s website and facebook page have a steadily-growing group of followers and supporters and the live camera shows visitors and interested folks stopping all day long as they sit in the blazing sun, they’ve received no press coverage from major Japanese newspapers at all. Nothing on the nightly news. So how do the four young people remain so positive? Going into their eighth day, they still retain their even tempers and cheerful outlook, describing the day’s events for the watchers on the camera every evening, and thanking (by name) those that stopped to talk with and encourage them.

Taking a hint from Shiori-san, who mentioned the influence of Ghandi, it seems clear that

The well-beloved Master hunger-striker.

the group themselves have a very different definition of “success”, and are probably less concerned than I about the Time Out article. Here’s what Shiori says in an interview with a foreign reporter: “I know this hunger strike won’t change a really big thing but I hope and I will be happy if more people will think about this problem….and I really want everyone to know that there are kind of young person that are thinking, really really seriously thinking about our future….I hope you feel something.” Again, her English is not perfect, but watching her using the language so unhesitatingly–making no excuses and focusing intently on the questions rather than her own linguistic struggle–I feel a great respect for her. So many Japanese young people are unable to leave their own insecurities behind and strive to attain English fluency, but Shiori is not one of them. She’s serious, and she’ll be happy if she can influence the people she comes in contact with to think more seriously, and to feel something for her cause. Her goal is to change the hearts of individuals. Ghandi, whose ideals she admires, said, “All true change comes from within. Any change brought about by pressure, is worthless.”

The Tokyo Time Out reporter was looking for drama, but he got a very quiet, respectable protest, focused on individuals…..Again, here’s what the master hunger-striker Mahatma Ghandi said in 1924: “Civil disobedience has to be civil in more senses than one. There can be no bravado, no impetuousness about it. It has to be an ordered, well-thought out, humble offering.” Kin-san and his friends certainly fit this description…. Or how about this? From Ghandi’s later writings: “Inner culture must be reflected in your speech, the way in

Kanta never loses his cool. I love his winning smile.

which you treat visitors and guests, and behave towards one another and your teachers and elders.” The gentle, unthreatening manner of the four friends has been a delight to watch on camera, and I’ve marvelled at the steady stream of people from all walks of life who have stopped to talk, brought instruments to play, or just stayed to sit with the young people in solidarity. They four young people are unfailingly polite to all, and remember to thank each one by name at the end of the day. My guess is that they have made a lasting impression on those who took the time to stop. They impressed me, and I tell you that is not such an easy thing to do. I am usually far more impressed by the accomplishments of age than those of youth.

By their own standard, then, they have already achieved something. Countless people (well, they’ve been counted, actually, since there’s a counter on the website) have followed them on live camera, many have made special trips to Tokyo specifically to meet and support them, and there’s no doubt in my mind that the guys in suits who commute to the METI building every morning are intensely aware of their presence. Is that not enough? No blood shed, no confrontations, and no internal injuries from extended fasting (you’d better believe that I researched THAT as well. I was rather dumbfounded to realize the length of time the human body can survive without solid sustenance, and reassured that ten days would entail no lasting effects for Kin-chan and his friends. Still, it’s a humbling thing to even consider. Could I myself do it??) ….this is my kind of protest.

In the end, these four young people are beginning to master themselves, and to take control of their own future. Ghandi (again) says that, “Fearlessness is the first thing indispensable before we can achieve anything permanent and real.” And in my mind, Kin-san, Masaaki, Kanta, and Shiori are fearless in more ways than one. Of course, all four can already claim to have achieved a victory of the will that most of us can only dream of. Ghandi says, “To have no control over the senses is like sailing in a rudderless ship, bound to break to pieces on coming in contact with the very first rock.” These four will not break to pieces. They can sit in the hot sun for hours, allowing themselves only water and mouthfuls of salt crystals, AND STILL RETAIN THEIR GOOD TEMPERS. The last is (as you guess by my use of capitals) most impressive. How many reality shows have we watched, where people are simply unable to remain civil on live camera for extended periods of time? These kids put most of us to shame. They have left childhood behind, and are moving toward a future of their own choosing.

……and this is so not-Japanese. Some friends of mine (Japanese) have commented that these young people should be looking out for their futures in a more “traditional” sense. Shiori and Masaaki are college students, and will presumably return to some sort of “normal” life once the strike is over. I wonder. But Kin-chan and Kanta (the wanderer) are

Ordinary kids?? Well, I call them heros!

in what would be a “Gap Year” for some societies…there’s no such positive terminology in Japanese. My women friends here in Hadano would be concerned that 1. They will never find a job, 2. They will never find a wife, and 3. They will never become respected members of society because they haven’t achieved either 1. or 2. Hmmmm….it looks like Kin-chan and Kanta are unconcerned, to say the least (I wonder about their parents, though), and certainly by international standards, they are nothing unusual. I want to make it clear to friends abroad, however, that they are very unusual. And that the choices they have made require a great deal of courage, because Japan is still a society where the pattern comes already decided, the choices are limited, and the window of opportunity exists for only a limited time. Because of that, I consider these young people to be especially brave.

So let’s hear it for the Brave and Restrained! If weather permits, and if my family are all healthy and no-one at home needs me for the day, I am off to Tokyo tomorrow to meet Kin-chan and his friends. There will be a demonstration at the Meiji Jingu park as well; perhaps (if I don’t get lost. I am not a Tokyo native) I can do both. I will take my excellent camera and share whatever pictures I get. Good night. It is always late in the evening when I finish a post, and I wonder if I’ll think twice about what I wrote in the morning, but this time, I think I will not. As always, thank you for reading. Take some time to think about the future of our young people and the kind of legacy they deserve. Check them out on their live web cam as well!   Find them at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/将来を想うハンガーストライキ-hunger-strike-for-the-future-in-tokyo